Other Cool Blogs: considerable 7/9/2020

Arika Okrent put together “11 grammar rules that changed since you were in school” for considerable on July 9, 2020.

#3 – Split infinitives is the one I run into the most when editing, but all of the list presented have their place in the tides of language transition.

Again the post is: https://www.considerable.com/life/language/grammar-rules-that-changed-since-you-were-in-school

Other Cool Blogs: ProWritingAid (undated)

Ellipsis: Examples and Meaning – The Grammar Guide (prowritingaid.com) – click link for full article

I use Ellipsises, Ellipsi – oh, the article provides the plural – Ellipses a lot in my writing. Originally introduced to it for formal writing when words are dropped from a quote, I’ve embraced it for fiction writing when a character drifts off in what they want to say … and in informal writing for a change of thought that is sideways related to what I’m saying. Close enough that a period isn’t appropriate, but far enough away that a comma doesn’t work either.

Learn more about my favorite punctuation by clicking on the above link. (You may be a writer if you have a favorite punctuation … just saying.) 

Editing Rant: Effect vs. Affect

I hate AFFECT / EFFECT.
From Merriam-Webster:

Affect is usually a verb meaning “to produce an effect upon,” as in “the weather affected his mood.” Effect is usually a noun meaning “a change that results when something is done or happens,” as in “computers have had a huge effect on our lives.” There are exceptions, but if you think of affect as a verb and effect as a noun, you’ll be right a majority of the time.

The full article is here:

Merriam-Webster. ‘Affect’ vs. ‘Effect’ – How to pick the right one. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/affect-vs-effect-usage-difference (last viewed 4/16/2022)

Geeking Science: Concrete Structure

Photo by Pascal Meier on Unsplash 

Normally when I start talking about concrete on this blog, I discussing concrete nouns – nouns which can be identified through one of the five senses (taste, touch, sight, hearing, or smell). Things like concrete, seawater, cement, 3D-printers for houses, and chemical reactions. (And if you need to know more about concrete nouns vs. abstract nouns, check out the grammarly blog listed in the bibliography below).

But for today’s Geeking Science, I am going to fangirl over real concrete.

I know, you are going, ReaLLY? Concrete is something to be excited over? Oh, there are SOOOO many Geeking Science reasons to be excited over concrete. Just you wait.

First, though, I need to explain the difference between Cement and Concrete. Many people consider these terms to be interchangeable, and they are not. Cement is an INGREDIENT of Concrete. Concrete is the combination of aggregates and paste – rock and rock-like substances and something to hold it together. (Concrete Alberta) Cement is the binding agent, but concrete is stronger than cement because of the solid chunks. 

Most modern concrete has Portland Cement as a base structure, about 10 to 15 percent. The rocky bits are sand, gravel, and crushed stone. The pastey bits is the Portland cement and water. The water has to be first mixed-in correctly and then dehydrated-out in a control manner as the cement-paste hardens.

Geeking Science cool bits. While living in Texas, I discovered there are the “cement” construction months – which is not “summer”, very much not summer. In the North, summer is the construction month. Texas, at least where I lived in Waco, could get so hot and dry during the summer, concrete and cement would start hardening as it was poured. Even during the spring and fall months, sprinklers would run over the concrete slabs for days to create a controlled drying process. I expect other hot, dry climates need similar mitigation techniques.

But the results of careful drying is important, because during the hardening process, concrete gets stronger. And rewetting and redrying after the initial hardening, continues this process for years. The older the concrete, the stronger – except for a couple weaknesses inherent in modern concrete.

One is the blessing and curse of rebar enforced concrete. Creating a metal cage as additional support allows the amazing shapes and features Frank Lloyd Wright and modern skyscraper architects explore. But the metal expands and contracts differently than the concrete, plus can rust over time. The expansion/contraction cycle leads to cracks and the rust leads to failure of support. Modern concrete has about a century lifespan because of these limitations.

(Notice in the picture the patching done on the concrete apartment building.)

Another reason for the short lifespan (though much longer than many other materials, such as road asphalt – cement is the MUCH better material for making roads, but that long drying time means it is the bottom layer, not the replacement layer once the road is in use) is modern thought is to make the cement as non-chemically reactive as possible. Once the concrete has set, it stops changing for the most part. Some hardening continues, but it doesn’t chemical rebond or anything strange. This makes it brittle. The reinforced nature makes modern concrete flexible – the combination of brittle and flexible means cracking.

Not like Roman Concrete. Oh, boy – this is exciting. So Roman Concrete used volcanic ash, lime, and seawater for the paste instead of Portland cement. Volcanic ash does this cement thing on its own, at least the ash available in Italy. The result is a Concrete which doesn’t last for 100 years … more like 2,000 years! The chemical difference of the ash, interacting with seawater creates new chemical bonds linking the paste to the rocks – binding everything together in one unit.

Instead of the constant chipping and crushing seen in modern concrete, Roman concrete just bonded stronger and stronger. Romans used it for everything – bathhouses, stairs, government buildings, piers, and warehouses. All of which have examples still standing. Plus, instead of seawater corroding the metal rebar and destroying the concrete overtime, the deposits left by the seawater created stronger and stronger concrete. (Unews, 2017)

We’ve lost the tech for this, but researchers are trying to rediscover it.

Why?

Well, tidal energy is a renewal resource since it is created by the rise and fall of tides because of the gravitational interaction between the Earth, sun, and moon. (Pacific Northwest) But to access it, structures will need to be built in the very chemically reactive seawater. Getting the Roman form of concrete back will allow concrete piers and platforms to capture tidal energy without falling apart before they make back their investment.

Another Geeking Science moment for concrete is where it overlaps with one of my faves of modern tech, the growing industry of 3D printing. Small computer printing uses a fluid it can pour out to create a structure. With a really BIG 3D printer, houses can be built using concrete. I may have lost a day or two in the youtube rabbit hole watching all the ways 3D printing is revolutionizing housing. Foundation and walls made out of concrete built by a machine with four people in two days. 

I love all the pluses of the concrete houses. They don’t have to be boxes, but curves and fantastical shapes will create a new Renaissance for architecture just like the reinforced (rebar) concrete flexibility did during its day. The houses take months less time to create, allowing quick building of houses. Having only a few people involved makes construction possible even during pandemic limitations. Less travel of material. Oh, and no waste! Just like with all 3D printing, construction will only need to use the materials to build the house instead of cutting away the extra. Everything is custom-made. The 3D printed houses are proving well-insulated, earthquake-resistant level flexibility, and wind-resistant weight and anchorage – meeting multiple construction requirements around the nation. (Chang 2021, Tech Machine 2022)

But what really, really, really has me totally Geeking Out is NASA is working on making the 3D printing for housing work for space. (Focal Point 2019) Humanity’s first homes in the stars will be built by robots sent out to print the homes before the colonists arrive, using the materials onsite. Another reason to figure out how that super-duper Roman concrete works. Reinforced concrete won’t be an option in space – metal requires too much industry. But concrete, humanity has been doing that long before the industrial age (like 10,000 BC!). Mixing stone and paste together doesn’t need a huge tech base to build or maintain.

So much Concrete goodness! From the past, the present, and into the future, concrete has a lot to Geek Out about.

Bibliography

Change, Brittany. “Habitat for Humanity created a 3D-printed concrete home for a family in Virgina – see what it’s like inside.” Insider. 2021 December 29. https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-3d-printed-home-habitat-for-humanity-zero-interest-2021-7 (last viewed 4/8/2022)

Concrete Alberta. “The difference between cement and concrete.” (last viewed 4/8/2022 – link no longer working as of 2/24/2023)

Focal Point. “NASA’s Challenge to 3D Print Future Habitats on Mars.” 2019 August 25. https://youtu.be/XWJ-sE08ASg (last viewed 4/8/2022)

grammarly. “Concrete Noun vs. Abstract Nouns.” https://www.grammarly.com/blog/concrete-vs-abstract-nouns/ (last viewed 4/8/2022)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. “What is Tidal Energy?” https://www.pnnl.gov/explainer-articles/tidal-energy (last viewed 4/8/2022)

Tech Machine. “The Real Cost of a 3D Printed House.” 2022 January 21. https://youtu.be/ddesl3HDDe0 (last viewed 4/8/2022 – note: the voice on this makes several pronunciation mistakes like it is a machine instead of a human reading and the script has a repeat at one point. Lots of good information, but lacks a bit on presentation – 3.5 star instead of 5 star. The Focal Point video is much more fun to view.)

Unews. “How Seawater Strengthens Ancient Roman Concrete.” The University of Utah. 2017 July 03. https://unews.utah.edu/roman-concrete/ (last viewed 4/8/2022)

Van Mead, Nick. “A brief history of concrete: from 10,000 BC to 3D printed houses.” The Guardian. 2019 Feb 25. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/feb/25/a-brief-history-of-concrete-from-10000bc-to-3d-printed-houses (last viewed 4/8/2022)

Other Cool Blogs: SaidSimple – Paragraphs

Photo by Finn Mund on Unsplash

When should you make a new paragraph?

If you remember, way back in 2016 I talked about the power of paragraph breaks. SaidSimple presents a more in-depth posting with “When to Make a New Paragraph” (last updated 10/7/2021).

The posting shares the standard times when to make a new paragraph – by topic, change of time, change of place, when speakers change, and for dramatic effect.

For me, with the fiction editing, speaker change is an ongoing issue. I’m constantly commenting to my authors – camera change on who is speaking is a paragraph change. Same is true for most of the paragraph changes required – if a television would have a scene jump occur, then a paragraph change is needed on the paper. I know this imagery won’t work for everyone, but it helps some.

Nearly all of us learned the “by topic” rule when writing essays in high school. The rest of the new-paragraph-start rules have been absorbed indirectly – read the posting to solidify what you have learned : http://www.saidsimple.com/content/100835/

And remember, having everything in one huge page of information is draining on your reader, especially with modern tablets and phones.

White space is your friend. Break things up.